Indirect Costs in the CACFP and SFSP
Management Bulletin
Purpose: Policy, Beneficial Information
To: Child and Adult Care Food Program Sponsors and Summer Food Service Program Sponsors
Attention: Program Director
Number: CACFP-03-2016 and SFSP-03-2016
Date: January 2016
Subject: Indirect Costs in the Child and Adult Care Food Program and Summer Food Service Program
This Management Bulletin (MB) provides guidance on indirect costs in the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) and Summer Food Service Program (SFSP). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued Policy Memorandum SP 30-2015, CACFP 16-2015, and SFSP 18-2015 to clarify when sponsors must apply the new rules under Title 2, Code of Federal Regulations (2 CFR), Part 200 to federal awards.
Subtitle A, Chapter II, Part 200 of 2 CFR
replaces existing rules in Title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, parts 3015, 3016, 3019, and 3052, and cost principles addressed in 2 CFR, parts 220, 225, and 230 (Office of Management and Budget Circulars A-21, A-87, and A-122, respectively). Sponsors can find the Super-Circular on the U.S. Government Publishing Office eCFR web page, and may find the indirect cost section particularly beneficial.
Section 200.414(f) of 2 CFR
states:
In addition to the procedures outlined in the appendices in paragraph (e) of this section, any non-Federal entity that has never received a negotiated indirect cost rate, except for those non-Federal entities described in Appendix VII to Part 200—States and Local Government and Indian Tribe Indirect Cost Proposals, paragraph D.1.b, may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) which may be used indefinitely. As described in Section 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. If chosen, this methodology once elected must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which the non-Federal entity may apply to do at any time.
Nonprofit agencies participating in the CACFP or SFSP that have more than one source of funding, have shared costs that are not associated with one program, and have never obtained a negotiated indirect cost rate from their cognizant agency, may elect to include a 10 percent indirect cost rate in their budget beginning in the 2015–16 program year, and continuing indefinitely.
Agencies are required to submit a document from their cognizant agency the first year these indirect costs are included in their program budget that proves that they have never received an indirect cost rate in the past. While agencies are not required to submit a cost allocation plan to obtain initial approval for these indirect costs, agencies must maintain documentation to show that all costs charged to the CACFP and SFSP are allowable.
Summary
If your agency wishes to include indirect costs in its program budget, you must submit one of the following to your assigned program specialist:
-
If you have obtained an indirect cost rate from your cognizant agency, submit the verification letter from the cognizant agency.
-
If you have not yet obtained an indirect cost rate from your cognizant agency, submit verification from the cognizant agency that states that you have never received an indirect cost rate in the past.
Questions
If you have any questions regarding this MB, please contact your CACFP or SFSP Specialist.
CACFP
A list of CACFP Specialists is available on the Child and Adult Food Care Program Contact List or in the Download Forms section of the Child Nutrition Information and Payment System (CNIPS) as Form ID CACFP 01. You can also contact the CACFP Office Technician by email at CACFPinfo@dss.ca.gov to be directed to your CACFP Specialist.
SFSP
The SFSP Specialist Contact List is located in the CNIPS Download Forms section as Form ID SFSP 01. You can also contact the SFSP Office Technician by email at SFSP@cde.ca.gov to be directed to your SFSP Specialist.
This institution is an equal opportunity provider.
Esta institución es un proveedor que ofrece igualdad de oportunidades.